Comparative evaluation of different solar radiation models with Angstrom-Prescott model for Hazaribagh, Jharkhand
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v26i4.2736Keywords:
Model Performance, Solar Radiation, Seasonal Variation, Regression analysis, Angstrom-PrescottAbstract
This study evaluates the performance of six solar radiation models for Hazaribagh in Jharkhand by comparing their estimates with those derived from the Angstrom-Prescott (A-P) model, which served as the benchmark reference. The results revealed significant variability in model performance on both a monthly and seasonal basis. The Togrul-Onat and Ertekin-Xaldiz models tended to overestimate solar radiation, particularly during the summer months, while underestimating it in the remaining months. In contrast, the Ogelman model consistently underestimated solar radiation throughout the entire year. The Almorox-Hontoria model showed only minor overestimations in certain months, while the Chen model primarily overestimated during the spring and early summer. On a monthly scale, all selected models showed a positive correlation with the standard Angstrom-Prescott (A-P) model, with R² values ranging from 0.52 to 0.99. Notably, the Almorox-Hontoria model exhibited the strongest positive correlation (R² = 0.993) with the A-P model, identifying it as the most reliable for estimating solar radiation. On a seasonal scale, the models generally performed well, with R² values ranging from 0.85 to 0.99. However, the Togrul-Onat and Ertekin-Xaldiz models exhibited weaker correlations with the A-P model, particularly during the Zaid season, indicating their limitations in accurately estimating average daily solar radiation during this period. These results highlight the necessity of careful model selection and calibration to account for seasonal variability. Overall, the Almorox-Hontoria model demonstrated the highest accuracy and consistency across both monthly and seasonal scales, emphasizing the importance of adjusting models to specific temporal and geographic conditions.
References
Almorox, J. and Hontoria, C. (2004). Global solar radiation estimation using sunshine duration in Spain. Energ. Conver. Manage., 45(9-10): 1529-1535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2003.08.022
Almorox, J. (2011). Estimating global solar radiation from common meteorological data in Aranjuez, Spain. J Atmos. Solar-Terrest. Phy., 73(13): 1989-1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.06.011.
Angstrom, A. (1924). Solar and terrestrial radiation. Quart. J. Royal Meteorol. Soc., 50(210): 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49705021008
Chen, R., Ersi, K., Yang, J., Lu, S. and Zhao, W. (2004). Validation of five global radiation models with measured daily data in China. Energy Convers. Manage., 45(11-12): 1759-1769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2003.09.019
Ertekin, C. and Yaldiz, O. (1999). Estimation of monthly average daily global radiation on horizontal surface for Antalya, Turkey. Renew. Energy., 17(1): 95-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(98)00106-9
Gani, A., Mohammadi, K. and Shamshirband, S., (2015). Day of the year-based prediction of horizontal global solar radiation by a neural network auto-regressive model. Renewable Energy, 75, 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.009
Hao, Z. and Liu, H. (2021). Influence of Geographic and Environmental Factors on Solar Radiation Estimation Models: A Seasonal Analysis. Ren. Energ, 179: 1006-1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.08.072
Jones, L. and Brown, M. (2021). Evaluation of Solar Radiation Models and Their Impacts on Agricultural Productivity. Inter. J. Agric. Sci. Tech., 22(1): 58-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijast.2021.01.005
Ogelman, H., Ecevit, A. and Tasdemiroglu, E. (1984). A new method for estimating solar radiation from bright sunshine data. Solar Energ., 33(6): 619-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(84)90016-2
Prescott, J. A. (1940). Evaporation from a water surface in relation to solar radiation. Trans. Royal Soc. South Australia, 64: 114-118.
Sharma, V., Changade, N.M., Suryakant, B.T., Yadav, K.K. and Yadav, B.K. (2023). Climatological approaches of irrigation scheduling for growing tomato crop under drip irrigation in Sub tropical region of Punjab. J. Agrometeorol., 25(4): 565-570.https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v25i4.2269
Sivakumar, M. (2023). Importance of solar radiation and the need for improved respect to Sun by Agrometeorologists. J. Agrometeorol., 25(1): 51–60. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v25i1.1971
Smith, J., Doe, A. and Johnson, P. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Solar Radiation Estimation Models for Agricultural Applications. J Agric Environ. Sci., 15(3): 145-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaes.2020.03.004
Togrul, I. T. and Onat, E. (1999). A study for estimating solar radiation in Elazig using geographical and meteorological data. Ener. Conver. Manage., 40(14): 1577-1584. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(99)00023-6
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2024 YADVENDRA PAL SINGH, A. S. TOMAR, VIKAS SHARMA, NITIN M. CHANGADE, K. K YADAV
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is a human-readable summary of (and not a substitute for) the license. Disclaimer.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.