Comparative evaluation of different solar radiation models with Angstrom-Prescott model for Hazaribagh, Jharkhand

Authors

  • YADVENDRA PAL SINGH Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar, 144001, Punjab
  • A. S. TOMAR College of Technology, G.B. Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttrakhand
  • VIKAS SHARMA Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar, 144001, Punjab
  • NITIN M. CHANGADE Department of Soil Science and Agricultural Chemistry, School of Agriculture, Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar, 144001, Punjab
  • K. K YADAV Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture & Technology, Udaipur, 313001, Rajasthan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v26i4.2736

Keywords:

Model Performance, Solar Radiation, Seasonal Variation, Regression analysis, Angstrom-Prescott

Abstract

This study evaluates the performance of six solar radiation models for Hazaribagh in Jharkhand by comparing their estimates with those derived from the Angstrom-Prescott (A-P) model, which served as the benchmark reference. The results revealed significant variability in model performance on both a monthly and seasonal basis. The Togrul-Onat and Ertekin-Xaldiz models tended to overestimate solar radiation, particularly during the summer months, while underestimating it in the remaining months. In contrast, the Ogelman model consistently underestimated solar radiation throughout the entire year. The Almorox-Hontoria model showed only minor overestimations in certain months, while the Chen model primarily overestimated during the spring and early summer. On a monthly scale, all selected models showed a positive correlation with the standard Angstrom-Prescott (A-P) model, with R² values ranging from 0.52 to 0.99. Notably, the Almorox-Hontoria model exhibited the strongest positive correlation (R² = 0.993) with the A-P model, identifying it as the most reliable for estimating solar radiation. On a seasonal scale, the models generally performed well, with R² values ranging from 0.85 to 0.99. However, the Togrul-Onat and Ertekin-Xaldiz models exhibited weaker correlations with the A-P model, particularly during the Zaid season, indicating their limitations in accurately estimating average daily solar radiation during this period. These results highlight the necessity of careful model selection and calibration to account for seasonal variability. Overall, the Almorox-Hontoria model demonstrated the highest accuracy and consistency across both monthly and seasonal scales, emphasizing the importance of adjusting models to specific temporal and geographic conditions.

References

Almorox, J. and Hontoria, C. (2004). Global solar radiation estimation using sunshine duration in Spain. Energ. Conver. Manage., 45(9-10): 1529-1535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2003.08.022

Almorox, J. (2011). Estimating global solar radiation from common meteorological data in Aranjuez, Spain. J Atmos. Solar-Terrest. Phy., 73(13): 1989-1998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jastp.2011.06.011.

Angstrom, A. (1924). Solar and terrestrial radiation. Quart. J. Royal Meteorol. Soc., 50(210): 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49705021008

Chen, R., Ersi, K., Yang, J., Lu, S. and Zhao, W. (2004). Validation of five global radiation models with measured daily data in China. Energy Convers. Manage., 45(11-12): 1759-1769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2003.09.019

Ertekin, C. and Yaldiz, O. (1999). Estimation of monthly average daily global radiation on horizontal surface for Antalya, Turkey. Renew. Energy., 17(1): 95-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-1481(98)00106-9

Gani, A., Mohammadi, K. and Shamshirband, S., (2015). Day of the year-based prediction of horizontal global solar radiation by a neural network auto-regressive model. Renewable Energy, 75, 161-167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2014.09.009

Hao, Z. and Liu, H. (2021). Influence of Geographic and Environmental Factors on Solar Radiation Estimation Models: A Seasonal Analysis. Ren. Energ, 179: 1006-1019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.08.072

Jones, L. and Brown, M. (2021). Evaluation of Solar Radiation Models and Their Impacts on Agricultural Productivity. Inter. J. Agric. Sci. Tech., 22(1): 58-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijast.2021.01.005

Ogelman, H., Ecevit, A. and Tasdemiroglu, E. (1984). A new method for estimating solar radiation from bright sunshine data. Solar Energ., 33(6): 619-625. https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(84)90016-2

Prescott, J. A. (1940). Evaporation from a water surface in relation to solar radiation. Trans. Royal Soc. South Australia, 64: 114-118.

Sharma, V., Changade, N.M., Suryakant, B.T., Yadav, K.K. and Yadav, B.K. (2023). Climatological approaches of irrigation scheduling for growing tomato crop under drip irrigation in Sub tropical region of Punjab. J. Agrometeorol., 25(4): 565-570.https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v25i4.2269

Sivakumar, M. (2023). Importance of solar radiation and the need for improved respect to Sun by Agrometeorologists. J. Agrometeorol., 25(1): 51–60. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v25i1.1971

Smith, J., Doe, A. and Johnson, P. (2020). Comparative Analysis of Solar Radiation Estimation Models for Agricultural Applications. J Agric Environ. Sci., 15(3): 145-160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaes.2020.03.004

Togrul, I. T. and Onat, E. (1999). A study for estimating solar radiation in Elazig using geographical and meteorological data. Ener. Conver. Manage., 40(14): 1577-1584. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0196-8904(99)00023-6

Downloads

Published

01-12-2024

How to Cite

SINGH, Y. P., TOMAR, A. S., SHARMA, V., CHANGADE, N. M., & YADAV, K. K. (2024). Comparative evaluation of different solar radiation models with Angstrom-Prescott model for Hazaribagh, Jharkhand. Journal of Agrometeorology, 26(4), 454–458. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v26i4.2736

Issue

Section

Research Paper

Categories

Most read articles by the same author(s)