Field Spectroscopy-Assisted Machine Learning Framework for Assessing Agroclimatic Effects on Paddy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v28i3.3399Keywords:
Agroclimatic Stress, Crop Monitoring, Machine Learning, Spectral Indices, Spectroradiometer, PaddyAbstract
Assessment of yield-limiting factors in paddy production should be carried out properly in order to improve productivity under varying agro-climatic conditions. This research paper introduces a combined geospatial and machine learning system to estimate stage-based paddy yield stress during Kuruvai 2023 in the Thanjavur region using vegetation indices and agrometeorological variables. Five different satellite-derived vegetation indices were calibrated using spectroradiometer data during the vegetative, reproductive, and ripening stages. The field- and satellite-derived indices showed good agreement in calibration (R²=0.85-0.92). Correlation analysis showed that there were significant associations between rainfall_vegetation, humidity_reproductive, and yield variability, whereas the canopy vigor represented by ripening_EVI, SAVI correlated positively with grain filling and final productivity. Yield prediction before and after calibration was performed using machine learning models such as Multiple Linear Regression (MLR), K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN), Random Forest (RF), and eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost). Among these, XGBoost resulted in high performance after calibration (R²=0.908, RMSE=179.728 kg/ha, MAE=143.487 kg/ha). Feature importance revealed that reproductive-stage humidity, rainfall, and ripening-stage soil moisture were the most important yield drivers. This model can be used to provide a powerful decision-support tool for spatial stress mapping, accurate irrigation regulation, and climate-resilient crop strategies in irrigated rice environments.
References
(IPCC), I. P. on C. C. (2023). Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Working Group II Contribution to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844
Ahmad, L., Parvaze, S., Parvaze, S., & Kanth, R. H. (2017). FAO Reference evapotranspiration and crop water requirement of apple (Malus Pumila) in Kashmir Valley. Journal of Agrometeorology, 19(3), 262–264. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v19i3.668
Alibabaei, K., Gaspar, P. D., & Lima, T. M. (2021). Crop Yield Estimation Using Deep Learning Based on Climate Big Data and Irrigation Scheduling. Energies 2021, Vol. 14, Page 3004, 14(11), 3004. https://doi.org/10.3390/EN14113004
Dela Torre, D. M. G., Gao, J., & Macinnis-Ng, C. (2021). Remote sensing-based estimation of rice yields using various models: A critical review. Geo-Spatial Information Science, 24(4), 580–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2021.1936656
Dineshkumar, C., Nitheshnirmal, S., Bhardwaj, A., & Priyadarshini, K. N. (2019). Phenological Monitoring of Paddy Crop Using Time Series MODIS Data. 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/iecg2019-06205
Haboudane, D., Miller, J. R., Pattey, E., Zarco-Tejada, P. J., & Strachan, I. B. (2004). Hyperspectral vegetation indices and novel algorithms for predicting green LAI of crop canopies: Modeling and validation in the context of precision agriculture. Remote Sensing of Environment, 90(3), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.12.013
Hatfield, J. L., & Prueger, J. H. (2015). Temperature extremes: Effect on plant growth and development. Weather and Climate Extremes, 10, 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001
Jha, R. K., Kalita, P. K., & Cooke, R. A. (2021). Assessment of climatic parameters for future climate change in a major agricultural state in India. Climate, 9(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/cli9070111
Krithikha Sanju, S., & Bhagavathiappan, V. (2022). A comprehensive approach on predicting the crop yield using hybrid machine learning algorithms. Journal of Agrometeorology, 24(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v24i2.1561
Martinez, N. E., Sharp, J. L., Johnson, T. E., Kuhne, W. W., Stafford, C. T., & Duff, M. C. (2018). Reflectance-based vegetation index assessment of four plant species exposed to lithium chloride. Sensors (Switzerland), 18(9), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18092750
Palchowdhuri, Y., Valcarce-Diñeiro, R., King, P., & Sanabria-Soto, M. (2018). Classification of multi-temporal spectral indices for crop type mapping: A case study in Coalville, UK. Journal of Agricultural Science, 156(1), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859617000879
Sajan, B., Kanga, S., Singh, S. K., Mishra, V. N., & Durin, B. (2023). Spatial variations of LST and NDVI in Muzaffarpur district, Bihar using Google earth engine (GEE) during 1990-2020. Journal of Agrometeorology, 25(2), 262–267. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v25i2.2155
Shahhosseini, M., Hu, G., Huber, I., & Archontoulis, S. V. (2021). Coupling machine learning and crop modeling improves crop yield prediction in the US Corn Belt. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-80820-1
Sidhu, B. S., Sharda, R., & Singh, S. (2021). An assessment of water footprint for irrigated rice in Punjab. Journal of Agrometeorology, 23(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v23i1.84
Torgbor, B. A., Rahman, M. M., Brinkhoff, J., Sinha, P., & Robson, A. (2023). Integrating Remote Sensing and Weather Variables for Mango Yield Prediction Using a Machine Learning Approach. Remote Sensing, 15(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15123075
Verrelst, J., Malenovský, Z., Van der Tol, C., Camps-Valls, G., Gastellu-Etchegorry, J. P., Lewis, P., North, P., & Moreno, J. (2019). Quantifying Vegetation Biophysical Variables from Imaging Spectroscopy Data: A Review on Retrieval Methods. Surveys in Geophysics, 40(3), 589–629. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10712-018-9478-Y
Vidican, R., Mălinaș, A., Ranta, O., Moldovan, C., Marian, O., Ghețe, A., Ghișe, C. R., Popovici, F., & Cătunescu, G. M. (2023). Using Remote Sensing Vegetation Indices for the Discrimination and Monitoring of Agricultural Crops: A Critical Review. Agronomy, 13(12), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13123040
Wang, F., Yao, X., Xie, L., Zheng, J., & Xu, T. (2021). Rice yield estimation based on vegetation index and florescence spectral information from UAV hyperspectral remote sensing. Remote Sensing, 13(17), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13173390
Yan, X., Guo, Y., Ma, B., Zhao, Y., Guga, S., Zhang, J., Liu, X., Tong, Z., & Zhao, C. (2024). Hazard assessment of rice cold damage based on energy balance in paddy field. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 358, 110233. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AGRFORMET.2024.110233
Yoshida, S. (1981). Fundamentals of Rice Crop Science. Fundamentals of Rice Crop Science, 65–109.
Zheng, Q., Huang, W., Xia, Q., Dong, Y., Ye, H., Jiang, H., Chen, S., & Huang, S. (2023). Remote Sensing Monitoring of Rice Diseases and Pests from Different Data Sources: A Review. Agronomy, 13(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13071851
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2026 KARTHIK KARUNAKARAN, KARUPPASAMY SUDALAIMUTHU
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is a human-readable summary of (and not a substitute for) the license. Disclaimer.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
