Machine learning modeling of reference evapotranspiration in Central Luzon, Philippines

Authors

  • LEA S. CAGUIAT Agrometeorology, Bio-Structures and Environment Engineering Division, Institute of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, College of Engineering and Agro-Industrial Technology, University of the Philippines, Los Baños, Laguna 4031 Philippines https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2858-7988
  • RONALDO B. SALUDES Agrometeorology, Bio-Structures and Environment Engineering Division, Institute of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, College of Engineering and Agro-Industrial Technology, University of the Philippines, Los Baños, Laguna 4031 Philippines
  • MARION LUX Y. CASTRO Agrometeorology, Bio-Structures and Environment Engineering Division, Institute of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, College of Engineering and Agro-Industrial Technology, University of the Philippines, Los Baños, Laguna 4031 Philippines
  • RUBENITO M. LAMPAYAN LAMPAYAN Agrometeorology, Bio-Structures and Environment Engineering Division, Institute of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, College of Engineering and Agro-Industrial Technology, University of the Philippines, Los Baños, Laguna 4031 Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v27i4.2909

Keywords:

Reference evapotranspiration, FAO Penman-Monteith, Machine learning, Central Luzon, Limited weather data

Abstract

Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) is crucial for calculating irrigation requirements. Instruments that directly measure ETo are still costly and limited while the empirical models are data intensive. Meteorological data of Central Luzon, Philippines (1985-2019) were used to estimate ETo using the FAO Penman-Monteith method. The performances of machine learning algorithms in estimating ETo were analyzed using ground-based weather data. Optimal models were determined using decision thresholds (RMSE<0.39 mm day-1, R2>0.75, MSE<0.15 mm day-1, MAE<0.30 mm day-1). The models were further assessed using principal component analysis for finding relevant variables (σ2=0.95) and the Wilcoxon test for comparing two samples (α=0.05). Results show that optimal model required only two or three weather variables depending on the station. In general, the algorithms can be ranked as follows: Gaussian progress regression, Neural network, Support vector machines, Ensemble of trees, Regression trees, and Linear regression. The study reveals that machine learning can accurately predict ETo using ground-based weather data, and it can be a good alternative to data-intensive empirical models.

References

Addinsoft. (2020). XLSTAT support center: Wilcoxon signed rank test on two paired samples in excel tutorial. https://help.xlstat.com/s/article/wilcoxon-signed-rank-test-on-two-paired-samples-in-excel-tutorial?language=en_US

Allen, R., Pereira, L., Raes, D., and Smith, M. (1998). Crop evapotranspiration - Guidelines for computing crop water requirements - FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. https://www.fao.org/4/X0490E/x0490e00.htm

Bijlwan, Amit, Shweta Pokhriyal, Ranjan, R., R.K Singh, and Ankita Jha. (2024). Machine learning methods for estimating reference evapotranspiration. J. Agrometeorol., 26(1): 63–68. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v26i1.2462

Caguiat, L. S., Saludes, R. B., Castro, M. L. Y., and Lampayan, R. M. (2022). Spatio-Temporal Trend Analysis of Reference Evapotranspiration in Central Luzon, Philippines. Philippine J. Sci., 152 (S1): 33–46. https://philjournalsci.dost.gov.ph/images/pdf/pjs_pdf/vol152_S1_Meteorology/spatio-temporal_trend_analysis_of_reference_evapotranspiration_.pdf

Darshana, Pandey, A., and Pandey, R. P. (2013). Analysing trends in reference evapotranspiration and weather variables in the Tons River Basin in Central India. Stoch. Environ. Res. Risk Assess., 27(6):1407–1421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-012-0677-7

Dou, X., and Yang, Y. (2018). Modeling Evapotranspiration Response to Climatic Forcings Using Data-Driven Techniques in Grassland Ecosystems. Advan. Meteorol., 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/1824317

El-Shirbeny, M. A. (2016). Evaluation Of Hargreaves Based on Remote Sensing Method To Estimate Potential Crop Evapotranspiration. Intern. J. Geom., 11(23): 2143-2149. https://doi.org/10.21660/2016.23.1122

Feng, K., and Tian, J. (2021). RETRACTED ARTICLE: Forecasting reference evapotranspiration using data mining and limited climatic data. Europ. J. Remote Sens., 54(sup2):363–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/22797254.2020.1801355

Granata, F. (2019). Evapotranspiration evaluation models based on machine learning algorithms—A comparative study. Agric. Water Manag., 217: 303–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2019.03.015

Hargreaves, G. H., and Allen, R. G. (2003). History and Evaluation of Hargreaves Evapotranspiration Equation. J. Irrig. Drain. Engg., 129(1):53–63. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2003)129:1(53)

Karimi, S., Kisi, O., Kim, S., Nazemi, A. H., and Shiri, J. (2017). Modelling daily reference evapotranspiration in humid locations of South Korea using local and cross‐station data management scenarios. Intern. J. Climatol., 37(7): 3238–3246. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.4911

Khan, Y., Kumar, V., Setiya, P., and Satpathi, A. (2023). Comparison of phenological weather indices based statistical, machine learning and hybrid models for soybean yield forecasting in Uttarakhand. J. Agrometeorol., 25(3): 425–431. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v25i3.2232

MathWorks. (2021). Principal component analysis of raw data (Matlab R2021a documentation). https://www.mathworks.com/help/stats/pca.html;jsessionid=54b1f99cfeb0c309c7272a02abf8

Mooi, E., and Sarstedt, M. (2011). A Concise Guide to Market Research. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12541-6

PAGASA. (2020). Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and

Astronomical Services Administration. Climatological data from DOST-PAGASA. http://bagong.pagasa.dost.gov.ph/climate/climate-data

Shah, T. (2017). Train, validation, and test sets. https://tarangshah.com/blog/2017-12-03/train-validation-and-test-sets/

Valipour, M., Gholami Sefidkouhi, M. A., Raeini-Sarjaz, M., and Guzman, S. M. (2019). A Hybrid Data-Driven Machine Learning Technique for Evapotranspiration Modeling in Various Climates. Atmos., 10(6): 311. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos10060311

Wu, L., Peng, Y., Fan, J., and Wang, Y. (2019). Machine learning models for the estimation of monthly mean daily reference evapotranspiration based on cross-station and synthetic data. Hydrol. Res., 50(6): 1730–1750. https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2019.060

Downloads

Published

01-12-2025

How to Cite

CAGUIAT, L. S., SALUDES, R. B., CASTRO , M. L. Y., & LAMPAYAN, R. M. L. (2025). Machine learning modeling of reference evapotranspiration in Central Luzon, Philippines. Journal of Agrometeorology, 27(4), 464–469. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v27i4.2909

Issue

Section

Research Paper

Categories