Drought assessment in Kabul River basin using machine learnings

Authors

  • UZAIR KHAN Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • ALAMGIR KHALIL Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan
  • SHABIR JAN Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Peshawar, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v26i3.2674

Keywords:

Drought prediction, Climate change, Machine learning, Kabul River Basin, Standardised Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI)

Abstract

Droughts significantly impact water resources and agriculture, leading to economic losses and potential human fatalities. This study aims to predict droughts by analysing changes in the Standardised Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) for the Kabul River basin using data from 1981 to 2022. The research is divided into three phases: calculating SPEI, splitting the dataset into training (80%) and testing (20%) subsets, and evaluating model performance. Various machine learning algorithms, including XGBoost, Decision tree, AdaBoost, and KNN, were employed alongside different climatic variables. The models were assessed using statistical metrics such as R², RMSE, MAE, MSE for regression, and confusion matrix, accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, ROC AUC, and Log loss for classification. Results showed strong performance, with R² values of 0.97, 0.86, 0.92, and 0.96 for XGBoost, KNN, Decision tree, and AdaBoost, respectively. SPEI demonstrated significant potential for drought forecasting, and spatial distribution mapping revealed persistent moderate drought occurrences.

References

Hargreaves, G. H., and Allen, R. G. (2003). History and Evaluation of Hargreaves Evapotranspiration Equation. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 129(1): 53–63. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(2003)129:1(53)

Iqbal, M., Dahri, Z., Querner, E., Khan, A., and Hofstra, N. (2018). Impact of Climate Change on Flood Frequency and Intensity in the Kabul River Basin. Geosci., 8(4): 114. https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8040114

Khan, N., Nguyen, H. T. T., Galelli, S., and Cherubini, P. (2022). Increasing Drought Risks Over the Past Four Centuries Amidst Projected Flood Intensification in the Kabul River Basin (Afghanistan and Pakistan)—Evidence From Tree Rings. Geophys. Res. Lett., 49(24): e2022GL100703. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022GL100703

Panda, R. K., Mohanty, U. C., Dash, S., and Parhi, C. (2023). Flash drought in Odisha- prediction, impact assessment, coping strategies: Current status and future strategies. J. Agrometeorol., 25(4): 491–497. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v25i4.2450

Pandya, Parthsarthi, N. K. Gontia, and H. V. Parmar. (2022). Development of PCA-based composite drought index for agricultural drought assessment using remote- sensing. J. Agrometeorol., 24(4): 384–392. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v24i4.1738

Sakthipriya, D., and Thangavel, C. (2024). Comparison of machine learning classification algorithms based on weather variables and seed characteristics for the selection of paddy seed. J. Agrometeorol, 26(2): 209–214. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v26i2.2553

Sidiqi, M., Shrestha, S., and Ninsawat, S. (2018). Projection of climate change scenarios in the Kabul River Basin, Afghanistan. Curr. Sci, 114:(6). DOI: 10.18520/cs/v114/i06/1304-1310

Soh, Y. W., Koo, C. H., Huang, Y. F., and Fung, K. F. (2018). Application of artificial intelligence models for the prediction of standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) at Langat River Basin, Malaysia. Comput. Electron. Agric., 144, 164–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.12.002

Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Beguería, S. and López-Moreno, J. I. (2010). A multi-scalar drought index sensitive to global warming: the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index. J. Clim., 23:1696-1718

Downloads

Published

01-09-2024

How to Cite

KHAN, U., KHALIL, A., & JAN, S. (2024). Drought assessment in Kabul River basin using machine learnings. Journal of Agrometeorology, 26(3), 349–355. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v26i3.2674

Most read articles by the same author(s)