Comparative study of water requirements and water footprints of fibre crops hemp (Cannabis sativa) and cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v25i3.2260Keywords:
Cannabis sativa, Gossypium hirsutum, CWR, CIR, WF, hemp, cotton, fibre cropsAbstract
Water is a valuable and limited resource, which is becoming increasingly under pressure due to the impacts of climate change and over utilization by the agricultural industry. Cotton is the predominant natural fibre utilized within textiles and is a highly water-intensive crop, thereby contributing to the negative environmental impacts of water use in agriculture, such as depletion of water from ecosystems and other uses, land degradation, and dissemination of pollutants. Accordingly, there is significant interest in establishing alternative natural fibre sources, which have lower water requirements. Cannabis sativa (hemp) fibre is becoming an increasingly popular fibre alternative and is purported to require less water during its cultivation. Accordingly, herein data was compared across 28 prior published sources, which identified that hemp has a 38% lower crop water requirement (CWR), 60% lower water footprint (WF), 84% lower crop irrigation requirement (CIR), and 91% lower irrigated water footprint (IRF) as compared to cotton. Therefore, these results support hemp as a water-efficient environmentally sustainable alternative to cotton for fibre cultivation.
References
Ali, M. (2010). Crop water requirement and irrigation scheduling. Fundamentals of irrigation and on-farm water management: volume 1. Springer, New York, NY, pp. 399-452.
Allanov, K., Shamsiev, A., Durdiev, N., Avliyakulov, M., Karimov, A., and Khaitov, B. (2020). Improving nutrition and water use efficiencies of pima cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) varieties under arid conditions of Uzbekistan. J. Plant Nutri., 43: 2590-2600. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1793186
Aquatech, "Water Scarcity: Our Essential Guide to Humanity's Mega Challenge." Date Accessed: https://www.aquatechtrade.com/news/water-treatment/essential-guide-water-scarcity/
Barrett, J., Chadwick, M., and Chadwick, M. (2005). Ecological footprint and water analysis of cotton, hemp and polyester. Report prepared for and reviewed by BioRegional Development Group and World Wide Fund for Nature, Cymru. Stockholm Environment Institute.
Beshir, S. (2017). Review on estimation of crop water requirement, irrigation frequency and water use efficiency of cabbage production. J. Geosci. Environ. Prot., 5: 59. https://doi.org/10.4236/gep.2017.57007
Campbell, B.J., Berrada, A.F., Hudalla, C., Amaducci, S., and McKay, J.K. (2019). Genotype × environment interactions of industrial hemp cultivars highlight diverse responses to environmental factors. Agrosyst. Geosci. Environ., 2: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.2134/age2018.11.0057
Casa, R., Rossi, M., Sappa, G., and Trotta, A. (2009). Assessing crop water demand by remote sensing and GIS for the Pontina Plain, Central Italy. Water Resour. Manag., 23: 1685-1712.
Chapagain, A.K., Hoekstra, A.Y., Savenije, H.H., and Gautam, R. (2006). The water footprint of cotton consumption: An assessment of the impact of worldwide consumption of cotton products on the water resources in the cotton producing countries. Ecol. Econ., 60: 186-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.11.027
Fader, M., Shi, S., von Bloh, W., Bondeau, A., and Cramer, W. (2016). Mediterranean irrigation under climate change: more efficient irrigation needed to compensate for increases in irrigation water requirements. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20: 953-973. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-953-2016
Falkenmark, M. (1997). Meeting water requirements of an expanding world population. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., B 352: 929-936. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.1997.0072
Feike, T., Khor, L.Y., Mamitimin, Y., Ha, N., Li, L., Abdusalih, N., Xiao, H., and Doluschitz, R. (2017). Determinants of cotton farmers’ irrigation water management in arid Northwestern China. Agric. Water Manag., 187: 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2017.03.012
Fortenbery, T.R., and Bennett, M. (2004). Opportunities for commercial hemp production. Appl. Econ. Perspect. Policy, 26:97-117. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9353.2003.00164.x
Gómez‐Armayones, C., Kvalbein, A., Aamlid, T.S., and Knox, J.W. (2018). Assessing evidence on the agronomic and environmental impacts of turfgrass irrigation management. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 204: 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12265
Grant, N., Elemental Solutions (2008). A critique of the CSH water efficiency requirements. NBT Consult for the Good Homes Alliance.
Hatfield, J.L., Sauer, T.J., and Prueger, J.H. (2001). Managing soils to achieve greater water use efficiency: a review. Agron. J., 93: 271-280. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2001.932271x
Ibragimov, N., Evett, S.R., Esanbekov, Y., Kamilov, B.S., Mirzaev, L., and Lamers, J.P. (2007). Water use efficiency of irrigated cotton in Uzbekistan under drip and furrow irrigation. Agric. Water Manag., 90: 112-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2007.01.016
International Bank for Reconstruction and Development, "Water in Agriculture." Date Accessed: https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/water-in-agriculture#1
International Cotton Advisory Committee, "Production of Cotton Lint in '000 Metric Tonnes (Season 2021/22)." Date Accessed: https://www.icac.org/DataPortal/DataPortal?Year=2021/22%20proj
Jayakumar, M., Surendran, U., and Manickasundaram, P. (2015). Drip fertigation program on growth, crop productivity, water, and fertilizer-use efficiency of BT cotton in semi-arid tropical region of India. Commun. Soil. Sci. Plant Anal., 46:293-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103624.2014.969403
Kooistra, K., Termorshuizen, A.J., and Pyburn, R. (2006). The sustainability of cotton: Consequences for man and environment. Science Shop Wageningen University & Research Centre, Wageningen, Netherlands.
Kouser, S., and Qaim, M. (2014). Bt cotton, damage control and optimal levels of pesticide use in Pakistan. Environ. Dev. Econ., 19: 704-723. https://doi:10.1017/S1355770X1300051X
Kumar, P.S., Prasanth, S., Harish, S., and Rishikesh, M. (2021). Industrial water footprint: case study on textile industries. In: Muthu, S.S. (Ed.), Environmental Footprints and Eco-design of Products and Processes. Springer, Singapore, pp. 35-60.
Manalil, S., Coast, O., Werth, J., and Chauhan, B.S. (2017). Weed management in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) through weed-crop competition: A review. Crop Prot., 95: 53-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.08.008
Mehari, H. (2019). Review on: impact of climate change on crop water requirement in Ethiopia. Int. J. Novel Res. Life Sci., 6: 24-34.
Mehta, R., and Pandey, V. (2016). Crop water requirement (ETc) of different crops of middle Gujarat. J. Agrometeorol., 18(1): 83-87. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v18i1.906
Mekonnen, M.M., and Hoekstra, A.Y. (2011). The green, blue and grey water footprint of crops and derived crop products. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 15: 1577-1600. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1577-2011
Okafor, C.C., Madu, C.N., Ajaero, C.C., Ibekwe, J.C., Nzekwe, C.A., Okafor, C., Madu, C., Ajaero, C., Ibekwe, J., and Nzekwe, C. (2021). Sustainable management of textile and clothing. Clean Technol. Recycl., 1: 70-87.
Oosterbaan, R. (1988). Effectiveness and social/environmental impacts of irrigation projects: a criticial review. ILRI Annual Report. International Institute for Land Reclamation and Improvement, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp. 18-34.
Pfister, S., Bayer, P., Koehler, A., and Hellweg, S. (2011). Environmental impacts of water use in global crop production: hotspots and trade-offs with land use. Environ. Sci. Technol., 45: 5761-5768. https://doi.org/10.1021/es1041755
Quezada, C., Fischer, S., Campos, J., and Ardiles, D. (2011). Water requirements and water use efficiency of carrot under drip irrigation in a haploxerand soil. J. Soil Sci. Plant Nutr., 11: 16-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-95162011000100002
Richards, R., Rebetzke, G., Condon, A., and Van Herwaarden, A. (2002). Breeding opportunities for increasing the efficiency of water use and crop yield in temperate cereals. Crop Sci., 42,:111-121. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2002.1110
Schumacher, A.G.D., Pequito, S., and Pazour, J. (2020). Industrial hemp fiber: A sustainable and economical alternative to cotton. J. Clean. Prod., 268: 122180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122180
Seckler, D., Molden, D., and Sakthivadivel, R. (2003). The concept of efficiency in water-resources management and policy. Water productivity in agriculture: Limits and opportunities for improvement. CABI Publishing Wallingford UK, pp. 37-51.
Stone, L.R. (2003). Crop water use requirements and water use efficiency. 15th annual Central Plains irrigation conference and exposition proceedings, February 4-5, 2003, Colby, Kansas. Colorado State University. Libraries.
Surendran, U., Sushanth, C., Mammen, G., and Joseph, E. (2015). Modelling the crop water requirement using FAO-CROPWAT and assessment of water resources for sustainable water resource management: A case study in Palakkad district of humid tropical Kerala, India. Aquat. Procedia, 4:1211-1219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.154
Verma, R.D. (1986). Environmental impacts of irrigation projects. J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 112: 322-330. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1986)112:4(322)
Voora, V., Larrea, C., and Bermudez, S. (2020). Global market report: cotton. JSTOR.
World Wildlife Fund, "Sustainable agriculture: Cotton." Date Accessed: 23/02/2023, https://www.worldwildlife.org/industries/cotton#:~:text=20%2C000%20liters,food%20crop%20in%20the%20world
World Wildlife Fund, "Threats: Water Scarcity." Date Accessed: 28/02/2023, https://www.worldwildlife.org/threats/water-scarcity
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Categories
License
Copyright (c) 2023 KIMBER WISE, ESTELLA BAZIOTOPOULOS, CATHERINE ZHANG, MYLES LEAMING, LI-HENG SHEN, JAMIE SELBY-PHAM
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is a human-readable summary of (and not a substitute for) the license. Disclaimer.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
