Response of stress irrigation management on chlorophyll content, water potential, PAR and canopy temperature in tomato (Lycopersicum Esculentum Mill.)


  • KOMAL CHAVAN Department of Agronomy, Mahatma Phule Krishi Vidyapeeth, Rahuri, Maharashtra, India
  • PRASHANT BODAKE Department of Agronomy, Dr Balasaheb Savant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Maharashtra, India



Partial root zone drying, rrigation, chlorophyll content, leaf water potential, tomato


 This study was conducted to investigate the response of stress irrigation management on chlorophyll content, water potential, photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) and canopy temperature in tomato during summer season. The main plot treatments consist of  three drying cycles that is 7, 11 and 15 days and sub treatments include four irrigation levels viz.,60, 80, 100, and 120 % ETC. The control treatments i.e. drip irrigation with 100% ETC on every two alternate days.  The results showed that the 7 days drying cycle showed maximum chlorophyll content, absorbed PAR and leaf water potential followed by 11 days drying cycle. Among the drip irrigation levels, the maximum drip irrigation levels 120 % ETC exhibited significantly maximum chlorophyll content, absorbed PAR and leaf water potential. However, it was at par with 100 % ETC and further 80 % ETC drip irrigation level also showed significant at 90 and 120 DAT. While in the case of difference between canopy and air temperature (Tc-Ta) less negative values were noted by 7 days drying cycle and 120% ETC drip irrigation level.


Abdelraouf, R.E., Okasha, E.M. and Tarabye, H.H.H. (2016). Modified design for drip irrigation system to improve the productivity of irrigation water and fertilizers distribution. Inter. J. Chem Tech Res. 9(9): 40-52.

Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. (1998). Crop Evapotranspiration, Guideline for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56. FAO Rome, Italy, 300 pp.

Ali, H.I., Ismail, M.R., Saud, H. M. and Manan, M.M. (2004). Effect of partial root zone drying (PRD) on growth, water use efficiency (WUE) and yield of tomatoes grown in soil less culture. Pertanika J. Trop. Agric.27(2): 143 -149.

Choudhary, V.K., Bhambri, M.C., Pandey, N. and Sharma, H.G. (2012). Effect of drip irrigation and mulches on physiological parameters, soil temperature, picking patterns and yield in capsicum (Capsicum annuum L.), Arch. Agron. Soil Sci.58(3): 277-292.

Davies WJ, Wilkinson S, Loveys BR (2002). Stomatal control by chemical signaling and the exploitation of this mechanism to increase water use efficiency in agriculture. New Phytol. 153:449–460.

Fisher, R.A. (1950). Statistical methods for research workers. 11th edition. Oliver and Boyd, London. pp-85.

Grimes, D.W., Walhood, V.T. and Dickens, W.L. (1968). Alternate-furrow irrigation for San Joaquin valley cotton. Calif. Agric.22: 4-6.

Liu F, Jensen CR, Shahnazari A, Andersen MN, Jacobsen SE (2005) ABA regulated stomatal control and photosynthetic water use efficiency of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) during progressive soil drying. Plant Sci. 168:831–836.

Ninanya Joan, Ramirez, D.A., Rinza, J., Silva-Diaz, C., Cervantes, M., Garcia, J. and Quiroz, R. 2021. Canopy temperature as a key physiological trait to improve yield prediction under water restrictions in potato. Agron.11(7) : 1436.

Panse, M.A. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1967). Statistical methods for agricultural workers. IInd End. ICAR, New Delhi. Pp. 135-136.

Saha, Sarathi, Saon Banerjee, Soumen Mondal, Asis Mukherjee, Rajib Nath, and Shibani Chowdhury. (2022). Evaluating radiation interception pattern and RUE of green gram grown in Lower Gangetic Plains and assessing future yield based on RUE. J. Agrometeorol, 24(1): 3–9.

Singandhupe, R.B., Rao, G.G.S.N., Patil, N.G. and Brahmanand, P.S. (2003). Fertigation studies and irrigation scheduling in drip irrigation system in tomato crop (Lycopersicon esculentum L.). Eur. J. Agron. 19 : 327-340.

Sleper, D.A., Fales, S.L. and Collins, M.E. (2007). Foreword. In: Irrigation of agricultural crops (R.J. Lascano and R.E. Sojka, eds.), 2nd edition, Agronomy Monograph no. 30. ASA-CSSA-SSSA publishing, 664.

Stoll Manfred, Loveys Brian and Dry Peter. (2000). Hormonal changes induced by partial root zone drying of irrigated grapevine. J. Exp. Bot. 51(350) : 1627-34.

Summy, K.D. Sharma, K.S. Boora, and Neeraj Kumar. (2015). Plant water status, canopy temperature and chlorophyll fluorescence in relation to yield improvement in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under soil moisture stress environments. J. Agrometeorol., 17(1): 11–16.

Topcu Sevilay, Kirda, C., Dasgan, Y., Kaman Harun, Cetin Mahmut, Yazici, A. and Bacon, M.A. (2007).Yield response and N-fertiliser recovery of tomato grown under deficit irrigation. Eur. J. Agron.26 : 64-70.

Wei, Z., Du, T., Zhang, J., Shujun, X., Paul, J. C., and Davies, W. J. (2016). Carbon isotope discrimination shows a higher water use efficiency under alternate partial root-zone irrigation of field-grown tomato. Agric. Water Manage. 165, 33–43.

Xu, H.L., Qin, F.F., Du, F.L., Xu, Q.C.,Wang, R., Shah, R.P., Zhao, A.H. and Li, F.M. (2009). Applications of xerophytophysiology in plant production -Partial root drying improves tomato crops. J. Sci. Food Agric.7:981-988.

Zegbe, J.A., Behboudian, M.H.and Clothier, B.E. (2004). Partial root zone drying is a feasible option for irrigating processing tomatoes. Agric. Water Manag. 68 : 195–206.

Zegbe, J. A., Behboudian, M.H., Lang, A. and Clothier, B.E.(2003). Deficit irrigation and partial root zone drying maintain fruit dry mass and enhance fruit quality in 'PetoPride' processing tomato (Lycopersicon escuelnutm, Mill.). Sci. Hortic. 98 : 505-510




How to Cite

CHAVAN, K., & BODAKE, P. (2023). Response of stress irrigation management on chlorophyll content, water potential, PAR and canopy temperature in tomato (Lycopersicum Esculentum Mill.). Journal of Agrometeorology, 25(3), 419–424.