Future climate suitability of underutilized tropical tuber crops-‘Aroids’ in India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v25i2.2152Keywords:
Elephant foot yam, taro, aroids, climate change, food security, climate suitabilityAbstract
Elephant foot yam and taro are the two important aroids of tropical tuber crops, considered as underutilized in the context of climate change and food security. The present study focused to quantify the future climate suitability of aroids for future climate scenarios 2030, 2050, and 2070 for the two representative concentration pathways (RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5). The district-wise future climate suitability of elephant foot yam and taro using MaxEnt across India was quantified. The percentage increase in climatically suitable area for taro is 49% and the same for elephant foot yam is 46% which is higher compared to those of tropical root crops. A total of 218 districts were identified as highly suitable for the cultivation of elephant foot yam for different RCPs across India. A total of 209 districts were observed as highly suitable for taro cultivation across India for the two RCPs. The information about the districtlevel suitability can assist decision-makers to understand the possible shifts in the climate suitability of aroids in India in the context of food security as they have higher productivity compared to other major food grain crops.
References
Balasubramanian, T.N. (2023). Global warming and health hazards to Indian farmers. J. Agrometeorol., 25(1): 92-97. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v25i1.1970
Bradbury, J.H. and Holloway, W.D. (1988). Chemistry of Tropical Root Crops: Significance for Nutrition and Agriculture in the Pacifics. XF2006282710.6.
Byju, G., Sabitha, S. and Vani, M. (2016). Projected climate changes and environment suitability of foot yam in major growing areas of India. Indian J. Hort., 75(2): 341-344.
FAOSTAT. (2022). Production; taro; world; 2020 (Online). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#rankings/countries_by_commodity. Accessed on 19 September 2022.
Fick, S.E. and Hijmans, R.J. (2017). WorldClim 2: new 1km spatial resolution climate surfaces for global land areas. Int. J. Climatol., 37 (12): 4302-4315
George, J. and Sunitha, S. (2017-2018). All India Coordinated Research Project on Tuber Crops (AICRP-TC): Annual Report. CTCRI|QSF|RP-416. Pp. 232.
Hatfield, J.L. and Prueger, J.H. (2015). Temperature extremes: effect on plant growth and development. Weather. Clim. Extremes, 10(A): 4-10.
Kumar, S., Graham, J., West, A.M. and Evangelista, P.H. (2014). Using district-level occurrences in MaxEnt for predicting the invasion potential of an exotic insect pest in India. Comput. Electron. Agric., 103:55-62.
Moreno-Cadena, P., Hoogenboom, G., Cock, J.H., Ramirez-Villegas, J., Pypers, P., Kreye, C., Tariku, M., Ezui, K.S., Lopez-Lavalle, L.A.B. and Asseng, S. (2021). Modelling growth, development and yield of cassava: A review. Field Crops Res., 267: 108140.
Phillips, S.J., Anderson, R.P. and Schapire, R.E. (2006). Maximum entropy modelling of species geographic distributions. Ecol. Mod., 190: 231-259.
Pushpalatha, R., Santhosh Mithra, V.S., Sunitha, S., George, J., Nedunchezhiyan, M., Mamatha, K., Ashok, P., Alam, S., Saud, B.K., Tarafdar, J., Mitra, S., Deo, C., Velmurugan, M., Suja, G., Ravi, V. and Byju, G. (2021a). Impact of climate change on the yield of tropical root and tuber crops vs. rice and potato in India. Food Sec., 10.1007/s12571-021-01226-z.
Pushpalatha, R., Shiny, R. and Byju, G. (2021b). Impact of climate change on the potential geographical suitability of cassava and sweet potato vs. rice and potato in India. Theoret. Appl. Clim., 146: 941-960. 10.1007/s00704-021-03763-1.
Ravi, V., Ravindran, C.S., Suja, G., George, J., Nedunchezhiyan, M., Byju, G. and Naskar, S.K. (2011). Crop physiology of elephant foot yam. Adv. Hort. Sci., 25(1): 51-63.
Raymundo, R., Asseng, S., Cammarano, D. and Quiroz, R. (2014). Potato, sweet potato, and yam models for climate change: A review. Field Crops Res., 166: 173-185.
Remya, K.R., Byju, G., Sabitha, S., Raju, S. and Ravi, V. (2019). Future changes in mean temperature and total precipitation and climate suitability of yam in major yam growing environments in India. Current Hort., 7(1): 28-42.
Sabitha, S., Byju, G. and Sreekumar, J. (2016). Proected changes in mean temperature and total precipitation and climate suitability of cassava in major growing environments of India. Indian J. Agri. Sci., 86(5): 647-653.
Singh, P. (2023). Crop models for assessing impact and adaptation options under climate change. J. Agrometeorol., 25(1): 18-33. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v25i1.1969
Singh, A.K., Chaurasiya, A.K. and Mitra, S. (2016). Aroids for ensuring livelihood security in India: A review. European J. Biomed. Pharm. Sci., 3(4): 459-463.
Shiny, R., Sreekumar, J. and Byju, G. (2019). Coupled multi-model climate and climate suitability change predictions for major cassava growing regions of India under two representative concentration pathways. J. Trop. Agri., 57(2): 140-151.
Sunitha, S., George, J., Suja, G., Jyothi, A.N. and Rajalekshmi, A. (2020). Water smart technologies for irrigation water management of elephant foot yam in tropical zones of India. J. Water Clim. Change, 11.4: 1495-1504.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 RAJI PUSHPALATHA, SUNITHA S, SANTHOSH MITHRA VS, BYJU GANGADHARAN
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
This is a human-readable summary of (and not a substitute for) the license. Disclaimer.
You are free to:
Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial — You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike — If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.